Microsoft created a website called Office2010themovie.com based on Blockbuster Movie designs.

They mentioned that the Technical Preview will be available to general public until July 2010. However, the Office 2010 Technical Preview applications will start automatically shutting down after 2 hours of use starting from March 2010.

Though the official version of Technical Preview is not expected until July 2009, Torrent sites has already released the version and is quite popular because of the increasing number of downloads.

The major change in the new Office 2010 is that it is available in both 32 bit and 64 bit flavours (something that should’ve happened long before). The next major thing I noticed is that the design has gone under a major rework based on Office 2007 theme. They also introduced new themes for Office Suites (however, only default theme is available in Technical Preview). The screenshots so far leaked are amazing and I tried the 64 bit version of Office 2010 in my Vista PC and was awesome by its beauty. Major rework has gone on many applications in terms of functionalities. The ribbon from Office 2007 is now available in all the applications (Office 2007 does not show ribbon in some applications like Outlook to make them feel compatible with Office 2003). Instead of the round button that showed Start Menu in Office 2007, it is now a rectangle button which shows a different screen for all menu operations and allows you to go back to work area. All office suites are following their official colour schemes throughout the Menus. The performance is slow but acceptable due to its beauty. Unusual introduction is Minimize, Close and Cancel links in Splash screens.

Related posts

• SharpDevelop vs Visual Studio (0)
• My first post from mobile (0)
• Shop your Laptop Online! (2)
• CyberSecurity Degrees (0)
• Ashop Shopping Cart (0)

My longing for this has been answered mightily by a Japanese freelancer who developed a small program named GDI++ that works on top of a Open Source product named FreeType (an advanced font rendering program across OSes). This small program works beautifully and adjusts the font rendering to Mac OS X like smooth and clarity all over the Windows. It is so beautiful how it can turn a boring looking windows to smooth and clear display. See the comparison shots below:

Without GDI++

With GDI++

Here are some instructions on how to get this working on your computer:

1. Download GDI++.
2. Extract this ZIP file in any directory, for example: C:\gdi
3. Double-click the file: gditray.exe
4. Now, your task bar you can note a “G”, like the image:
   
5. Double-click it, it should start glowing green:
   
6. Enjoy this beautiful font-smoothing.
7. You can adjust the font-smoothing level by right clicking this icon and choosing Use Preferences and selecting any of the three Japanese letters shown there.

Try it out…

Related posts

• No related posts.

Major Computer Security companies are already waging a war against the new entrant to their enmity named Conficker. It is a malicious program that is right now spreading all over the world through internet connected PCs by using hacked websites as spreaders. The program was found as a small footprint around February and slowly the author(s) seems to be updating the software with versions that strengthens the Worm. So far from what security experts can get from the various versions spread, it seems that the Worm is pre-programmed to listen to an unknown ‘Controller’ on April 1st. Given the nature of the worm’s capabilities so far showcased in disabling famous Anti-Virus softwares and Windows’ security updates, security experts fear that the worst can only be expected of it. It will most likely be a harmful worm than a mere April Fool’s joke. With the power it has already grown up, it is evident the the author(s) were extremely good in latest security technology and are increasing improving the program by releasing updates at a rate that is surprising for any single techie. It could be used to collect important data from all the infected computers or get all the infected computers to work as one forming the largest botnet ever. This botnet can be used very effectively to spam Internet and its beloved users at rates unthinkable. So, far major corporations failing to find a cure to this Worm is only saying so much about it’s power and the technological supremacy of its creator(s). Microsoft has already announced an award of $250,000 to anyone who can help find the authors of this Worm.

Read more about this worm in The New York Times.

Related posts

• SharpDevelop vs Visual Studio (0)
• A better alternative to Microsoft Visual Studio from Open Source community (1)
• Now run .NET Framework across multiple OS Platforms (1)
• Windows XP Service Pack 3 Release Candidate (0)
• Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam’s Keynote on Google India Conference (14)

As an Individual who has spent very good time on some of the best Open Source products, I always believed that having an alternative to the proprietary solutions that tend to be just the money machines is always refreshing. Many people think that Open Source means free software (in terms of cost). Open Source doesn’t meant to be free of cost. This is highly important because, many organizations, when offered a choice of Open Source, immediately backed up saying there’s as quality as the money goes (which means, the higher the price, the perfect the software – again a phenomenon). Individuals also believed that you can’t expect quality from a person who’s doing coding for free. That’s is true if we don’t consider the passion that some people really show in the work they do no matter whether it’s for a cost or not. There are also some Open Source softwares which are not free of cost. Again, as I stated, a software’s quality can’t be decided by its price or proprietary.

The significant difference as I see it, whether it’s a paid software or free-of-cost software lies in whether the software is open to modifications or not. Many organizations argue that having an Open Source software doesn’t means anything since they couldn’t modify it because of the unavailability of the resources or the time to do so. That’s acceptable, but that can’t be a reason to ignore a software that gives the possibility of modification against a software that gives a possibility of just patches that may come in a year. I would say the main reason why Open Source got so famous is because of the company Microsoft. They realized it very late. But its simply the single most reason why so many people got frustrated with Proprietary Softwares. The kind of frustrations that started with the Windows Operating System to all of Microsoft products that showed systemic errors which gave nothing as a reason to understand, support that always considers the Customer is the problem, updates that always breaks more things than the ones its supposed to fix. There are so many instances that can be told about this. But again, Microsoft is an example only (highly significant example). There are so many popular Proprietary software companies like Adobe, Corel etc that produces softwares which are used by millions of users worldwide yet giving them frustrations at some point of time. Any software that is written by human being can always contain bugs, that is an understandable universal fact. However, that doesn’t mean one shouldn’t be fixing it. That’s where Open Source gets handy providing a way to fix things by ourselves if we have the time and resources to do so. Or, at least allows us to look into the right place for answers when something goes wrong instead of closing itself sealed and ask us to contact the Administrator who was never there.

Another argument of corporates against Open Source is the availability of Customer Support. I actually get surprised when organizations through such a lame argument. Because, its prudently evident that you can get as much support as given by any Proprietary Software in any of the Open Source softwares if only you looked in the right place. Many Open Source products that are free-of-cost has a Support availability through community which is also free-of-cost or a paid contract for support just like the proprietary ones. Here, yet another advantage of Open Source softwares over proprietary softwares is that in most cases, for the proprietary softwares you’ll be ended up paying the license cost and support cost wherein Open source you’ll be paying for only the support. In the case of Proprietary software, community support is always very less because the community is again another set of frustrated users who either got lucky to find an way to fix the problem or paid the cost to know the solution. But, in Open Source, the community is the strongest support you can ever get as it consists of users who are passionate about figuring out the problem by themselves, hacking through the code and fix it by themselves instead of looking for outside support and people who actually wrote the original code of that software. In my experience, I’ve always seen that the best learning one can get is from the one they learned by hard ways.

Life-time of the Open Source softwares is another concern of Corporates. In this case, we have to be the judge of ourselves or get good judgement from the community. It is sadly true that most Open Source softwares tend to expire after some time. However, this is not the case with most popular open source products that learned a way to earn (through paid support or advertisements) and keep the community going. So, it will be a tough decision for the corporate to decide which parts of their IT infrastructure can be replaced by Open Source implementations that don’t just expire. There is also a high advantage if the corporate is willing to understand the code. If it spent enough time and resources to understand the code and structure of the open source implementation, they can always keep the software up to date despite of whether it got expired in the community or not. It also serves another purpose as if at any point of time they encounter a problem, they can simply fix it themselves.

Implementation and migration cost over proprietary implementations already in place is another huge concern of Corporates. I’ve to agree with this completely as it’s a very tough decision for Corporates who invested a lot in proprietary implementations that were running for quite some time. However, I would never suggest open source as a complete and overall drop in replacement. Implementation can be step by step and highly planned to avoid this. Also, once implemented, on the long run, it reduces much of the cost which is the running cost of proprietary implementations. Over a period of time, if we analyze, we may found that even the implementation cost is fully recovered by the reduced running costs.

Virus, Malwares and Trojans disguised as Open Source softwares is also a concern of individuals and corporates alike who are considering open source alternatives. I can’t guarantee here that every open source is secured. However, I can guarantee that most of the popular open source distributions tend to be more secure than the proprietary distributions. One should also consider the kind of place from where the software is being downloaded and run some anti virus tests before starting implementation. Downloading from official servers of the organization that developed the open source tends to be always more secure. Also, I’ve seen that open source implementations were quick to release updates if any vulnerabilities found in their software. Again, as I told previously, the corporates themselves can look into the code and decide if there were any malware code existing in the open source implementation. Particularly because of the Open Source nature, these kinds of malware codes tend to be less targeting the Open Source products against the highly targeted proprietary products. That is again another advantage of open sources considering in the case of proprietary softwares, you can’t find a way to cure the vulnerability until the developer themselves provides a patch.

Conclusively, in reality, there are more reasons to adopt Open Source than there are for adopting Proprietary Source if we know what we want and what we can do with what we require.

Please let me your comments…

Related posts

• Pretty good Open Source alternatives for Proprietary Products (0)
• Ashop Shopping Cart (0)
• Smorty – Get Paid for Blogging (6)

The Oscar Award for BEST ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES, ORIGINAL SONG goes to A. R. Rahman and Sampooran Singh Gulzar

The Oscar Award for BEST ACHIEVEMENT IN MUSIC WRITTEN FOR MOTION PICTURES, ORIGINAL SCORE goes to A. R. Rahman

Read the Oscars here at IMDb.

In this proud moment, I also proudly remember Bhanu Athaiya who was the first Indian to receive an Oscar for the Best Costume Design in the film Gandhi along with John Mollo in the year 1982.

Related posts

• New Blog in Tamil… (1)
• Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam’s Keynote on Google India Conference (14)
• Adhiyan Tamil Unicode Converter Firefox Plugin (2)
• Hutch is Now Vodafone in India (4)
• Happy 60th Independence Day! (0)

1. Download the Zip file that contains all the files explained here.
2. Download and Install the Monaco font for Windows.
3. Extract the Zip file to Desktop or your convenient Location
4. Start your Eclipse based IDE
5. Choose Window -> Preferences
6. Choose General -> Appearance -> Colors and Fonts
7. Expand Basic and choose Text font under that. Click on Change button from right side, choose the Monaco font and choose size as 9pt
8. Choose General / Your IDE Name / Your Plugin page for the specific Language
9. Expand the Editors under the above said group and look for the CSS, HTML, JavaScript, PHP, PHPDoc and ScriptDoc options.
10. In the extracted files you’ll see .col files for all the above specified languages.
11. Under the language group, select Colors and choose Import from the right side. Choose the appropriate .col file from the extracted location.
12. Click Apply and Close Preferences by clicking on OK. Close all open files and reopen them to see it in cool Vibrant Ink theme.

So far I’ve created theme for CSS, HTML, JavaScript, PHP, PHPDoc and ScriptDoc only. If you have an Eclipse based IDE that you’re using for any other languages (like Ruby, Python etc), please request here so that I can send you over the color files for the same.

Related posts

• Mocha UI: The next generation Web 2.0 Application Interface from MooTools (0)
• SharpDevelop vs Visual Studio (0)
• A better alternative to Microsoft Visual Studio from Open Source community (1)
• JavaScript Debugger Firefox Plugin (0)

1. Microsoft Visual Studio – SharpDevelop, MonoDevelop
2. Web Development IDEs – Eclipse, Aptana
3. Microsoft .NET Framework – Mono
4. Microsoft SQL Server – MySQL, PostgreSQL, FireBird
5. Microsoft Project – OpenProj, Open Workbench
6. Microsoft Visio – Dia, StarUML
7. Microsoft Publisher – Scribus
8. Microsoft Office – OpenOffice
9. Microsoft Office Outlook/Outlook Express – Evolution / Mozilla Thunderbird
10. Microsoft Exchange Server – Zimbra, OpenXchange
11. Microsoft SharePoint – Alfresco, Deki Wiki, DotNetNuke, PHPNuke
12. Mercury LoadRunner – OpenSTA
13. Adobe Flash – OpenLaszlo
14. Adobe Acrobat – PDFCreator
15. Adobe Photoshop – Paint.NET, CinePaint, GIMP, GIMPShop
16. Adobe Illustrator – Inkspace
17. Adobe Premier/After Effects – Avidemux / Jahshaka
18. BusinessObjects Crystal Reports – JasperReports, DataVision, OpenRPT
19. Microsoft Dynamics – SugarCRM
20. Microsoft Money / Quicken – GNUCash, Grisbi
21. MindManager – FreeMind
22. WinZip – 7zip
23. Beyond Compare (File/Directory) Comparison – WinMerge
24. CodeSmith (Easy Code Generator) – MyGeneration
25. Icon Editor – IcoFX
26. FTP Client – FileZilla

There are much more than this list is available. But this is a start to remove on famous proprietary softwares from your arsenal.

Related posts

• Open Source as an alternative to Corporates (0)

They’ve hosted a Visually Appealing Demo to test the capabilities of Mocha UI which is quite a head turner.

Next time you consider Adobe Flex, consider something much lighter like this.

Related posts

• Vibrant Ink theme for Eclipse based IDEs (4)
• Now run .NET Framework across multiple OS Platforms (1)
• JavaScript Debugger Firefox Plugin (0)
• Wonderful Tool IMified (0)

1. Open Source (Full Source Code available freely)
2. Completely Free to use for both Commercial and Personal use
3. Supports all .NET Framework, Compact Framework, WinForms (with excellent extra GTK# for X-Window based systems), Console Application, Direct3D (wow, Game Development anyone?), WPF, and Windows and Web Services.
4. Supports additional languages like Boo, F#, ILAsm and Python (very good)  out of box apart from C# and VB.NET.
5. Supports Installer Creation (a very likeable feature works better than VS in my opinion)
6. Light on Resources faster on Building (refer Point 8 below). The last time I checked, has only 80 KB of RAM with 0.x% CPU Usage even after opening a bulky WinForms project and keeping couple of forms open in design mode. (A relief from VS’s usual 128 KB or more RAM and 4-5% CPU Usage)
7. Inbuilt Refactoring Engine (you’ll need JetBrains ReSharper if you want this in Visual Studio)
8. Parallel Build support for Multi-core machines (faster building, very likeable feature which is sadly not available in VS)
9. Supports important Visual Studio add-ons like FxCop, StyleCop, NUnit, PartCover etc.
10. Version Controlling with Subversion (which is far better a solution than VSS. I’ll post another post soon explaining the benefits of SVN over VSS)
11. Wide range of very useful Add-ons (as the case with most Open Source projects)
12. Inbuilt Documentation Generator (Sandcastle, SHFB)
13. Very likeable Class Diagram and Code Coverage views
14. Very likeable F# Interactive, Boo Interpreter and Python Console
15. Supports Mono (the alternative .NET 2.0 Framework for Linux, BSD and Mac OS X)

What I see as disadvantages of SharpDevelop:

1. Code Editor has some minor glitches (I’ve seen some glitches on code folding and unfolding though it’s just visual not physical)
2. Lack of VSS Support (though I’m not looking forward to it as it’s a proprietary version control system to be included in any open source project like this)
3. Lack of Visual Studio like Object Browser (I miss that one here, though #Develop has very good Class Browser)
4. Somewhat Buggy (I’ve seen it crashing sometimes but understandable due to its Open Source nature)

But apart from this, programmatically speaking, you can do everything that you can do in VS with #Develop. It’s pretty impressive for a Open Source project.

Related posts

• Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview (0)
• The worm that threatens to harm computers worldwide at April 1st (0)
• Vibrant Ink theme for Eclipse based IDEs (4)
• A better alternative to Microsoft Visual Studio from Open Source community (1)
• Now run .NET Framework across multiple OS Platforms (1)

Now, you can shed all your worries of that and embrace the open source community for making a powerful Open Source IDE named SharpDevelop. It was so powerful that you can seriously consider it for a complete drop-in replacement of Microsoft Visual Studio. It supports almost all of the Visual Studio features and much more. It supports Subversion for Version Control. In my opinion Subversion is far great an Version Control system than VSS. Here is the screenshot of how it looks:

Related posts

• The worm that threatens to harm computers worldwide at April 1st (0)
• Vibrant Ink theme for Eclipse based IDEs (4)
• SharpDevelop vs Visual Studio (0)
• Now run .NET Framework across multiple OS Platforms (1)
• Windows XP Service Pack 3 Release Candidate (0)